Nestlé going beyond the “No”: Transforming supply chains through RE-storation, RE-forestation, RE-generation



While it is now well understood that supply chains are responsible for the biggest impacts our society has on ecosystems and people, it has not always been the case.



Back in 2010, Greenpeace brought on the table the evidence of links between the brand Kit Kat and the leading Indonesian palm oil grower, GAR. Building on the work we had done since 1999 in timber supply chains, where we had learnt how to transform opaque supply chains, we took on the challenge of bringing transparency to Nestlé’s supply chain. It would require going beyond labels and certification and make a bold, ambitious commitment in order to drive change in the supply chain. And that’s what Nestlé did. So was born the first “No Deforestation, No Exploitation” commitment.



It did many good things: it allowed for the creation of the “High Carbon Stock” methodology to really define what deforestation is in practice and it encouraged suppliers such as GAR, APICAL, WILMAR, LDC, MUSIM MAS to make their own commitment regarding deforestation. It brought an incredible level of transparency to the supply chain: companies started to publish the list of the mills that supply them. It unlocked innovation in how to monitor progress and measure impact – recently, some brands (Nestlé, Reckitt Benckiser, PZ Cussons) started to use a near real time satellite monitoring system - Starling - to track progress with their suppliers. It also went to scale with more than 400 companies following Nestlé is making such a commitment.



If you seek a good example of what “No Deforestation” concretely did (i.e avoiding the clearance of 15’000 Ha of forest in the Peruvian Amazon) I encourage you to take a look at the case study of the work done with Grupo Palmas, a Peruvian palm oil supplier to food companies. On the “No Exploitation” side of things, many things happened too: tens of thousands of passports were been given back to migrant workers in plantations thanks to dialogue that took place with social specialists in plantations in Malaysia.



But despite all those good things, a “No” remains a “No”. Some say “No” is the word of leadership. I’d agree as it is definitely a good way to say what you don’t want. But what we have also realized in implementing those commitments, is that farmers and suppliers, government, who are being asked to change are asking “what’s in it for me?” In other words, if I am a poor farmer in Indonesia, trying to expand my palm and rubber crops to get more cash for the family, what’s in it for me if I stop clearing land to plant? Also, as they aim at complying with the “No deforestation” requirements, companies have been ending up avoiding the risky areas, the problematic suppliers, exiting them from the supply chain and thus creating an illusion that the overall score of responsibility is progressing while bottom line deforestation remain present at a planetary level and keeps impacting us all.



So today, Nestlé’s announcement is a true game changer. They are moving from “I can’t be associated to these issues” to “I will also proactively look after the health of forests and soils where my raw materials come from”. And I will ensure they, and the people living in/off them thrive. It’s moving beyond the “No” to a “Re”. And it’s logical. To meet this climate commitment, they will need to RE-plant; RE-forest; RE-generate soils. It’s a massive shift in how a company like Nestlé uses its immense power and leverage over what happens upstream: instead of preserving an image it’s about proactively RE-turning value and care to nature and to people, where it matters for our planet.



Go back


African Climate Risks Conference (ACRC) 2019: REPORT

The African Climate Risks Conference (ACRC) 2019 concluded on Wednesday, 9 October, with a busy programme including plenary sessions, panel discussions, workshops, and seminars. In the morning, two plenary sessions focused on the state of climate information services for development support in Africa and on mobilizing investment in climate services. The report is available...

Read more …

FERN- Our Forests Our Lives: Stories of hope and resilience from forest communities around the world

It raises the voices of the Liberian women fighting to own and govern land that’s rightfully theirs, of the Guyanese Indigenous Peoples resisting companies attempting to seize their forests, of the rural Lao communities adapting to profound changes in lifestyles that have endured for generations, and of the Ghanaians finally getting justice from the logging operators in their areas.

Read more …

Greenpeace: Local and indigenous communities should have a right to their lands

International development agencies and our own government need to rethink their development approaches. Too often, instead of development, they end up degrading the environment and worsening social problems. Decisions on land acquisition for “development”, without consulting the indigenous and local communities that will be affected, are leaving them with no access to land, food, clean water and security. The progressive dispossession of indigenous peoples’ lands, underscores the precarious nature of the land rights of indigenous and local communities.

Read more …

greenpeace-International Day of Rural Women: The case of Baka from South Cameroon

In Cameroon, about half of my country is covered by forests. Home to incredible biodiversity, they are also central to the lives and livelihoods of many communities including the Baka. During my visits to the South region in the past three years, I had the opportunity to meet with the Baka people of the area. They’ve lived off the forest and firmly within it for centuries. Baka women in particular depend on the forest: they are food producers, knowledge holders, healers, and the keepers of their culture.

Read more …

World Indigenous Peoples Present Climate Action

“Our rivers and Lakes are drying, our forest burning, our grasses flooding and our children present is under threat with an uncertain future. African indigenous peoples are now more vulnerable than ever because of the changing climate directly impacting our livelihood and survival. We have our grand mother and father with incredible traditional knowledge that can help to the climate adaptation and mitigation but this needs to be ensured by respecting our rights and FPIC” - Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim

Read more …

FGF 2020 Applications Now Open !

We are pleased to announce that applications are now open for our first Forest Governance Forum in Asia. The event is taking place 11-12 February 2020 in Jakarta, Indonesia.

Read more …

November 12, 2019 - November 15, 2019 African Landscapes Dialogue Tanzania

Gathering Landscape Leaders from Across Africa for Peer-to-peer Learning and agenda-setting from the grassroots. 27 Sub-Saharan African countries have pledged to restore, or begin the process of restoring, over 96 million hectares of degraded land on the continent by 2030. 40 SSA countries include climate change mitigation from Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry in their (intended) Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) for the Paris Climate Accord. 34 NDCs include mitigation contributions from agriculture. Every African nation has signed on to the Sustainable Development Goals. The question now asked regularly: how will our countries keep these commitments?

Read more …

IHC-Securing gorillas in the Congo awarded with Germany’s highest Nature Film Prize

‘Paradise Preserved: Congo – Protecting the Gorilla Forests’, the film which Thomas Weidenbach produced for ARTE, received Germany’s Nature Film Prize on Saturday 5 October 2019. Commissioned by tv-channel ARTE, known to air cultural programmes, the film was broadcast at the end of June.

Read more …

CBFP News Archive


BCC 2020 Save the Date!
Forest Watch October 2019
World Bamboo Day
China goes green again!
GEF Newsletter | June 2019
The Cafi Dialogues
Forest Watch April 2019
Forest Watch March 2019