Are REDD+ donors learning quickly and deeply enough to make a difference? -CIFOR

To address urgent, complex and intertwined problems like climate change, deforestation and global inequality policymakers need to learn from various attempts to transform these “super wicked” challenges – and to put that learning into practice, fast.

 

In the case of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions caused by Deforestation and forest Degradation) deep learning is needed because climate action must be substantially transformative in nature to be effective and due to substantial trade-offs, including conflicts between competing objectives.

 

Researchers decided to take a new approach, investigating the perspective of donors from the Global North to complement studies focused on program beneficiaries in the Global South, said Heike Schroeder, a researcher at Britain’s University of East Anglia.

 

She is the lead author of a new study in Global Environmental Change that assesses the types and extent of learning about REDD+, the U.N.-backed initiative to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and enhance carbon stocks – by major donor countries Norway, Germany and the United Kingdom.

 

“I think that was something that we didn’t understand yet: how learning actually takes place and influences decisions among those financing REDD+,” said co-author and University of Helsinki researcher Maria Brockhaus, who is also collaborating with the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) on the wider analysis of politics in forests and climate change.

 

REDD+ has gone through a number of iterations since its inception 15 years ago. At that time, it was conceived as a relatively simple concept: wealthy nations – most of which have already benefiting from environmental degradation in their own countries and beyond – would pay people in developing countries not to fell or degrade their forests, in order to mitigate carbon emissions and address climate change.

 

But it quickly became apparent that “it was more difficult to actually affect change on the ground than initially thought,” said Schroeder. Donors realized that to make REDD+ appealing and worthwhile, they needed to work carefully with local communities, civil society and institutions at all levels – on issues ranging from governance, resource management, co-benefits and external deforestation drivers, to displacement, marginalization and identity loss.

 

“Donors learned that it’s not just about reducing deforestation and increasing the carbon stock, but it’s really about addressing all the various social and political problems first and foremost,” said Schroeder. “That’s resulted in ongoing reorientation toward working a lot more with the non-state sector, not just giving money to governments, but supporting grassroots local communities and indigenous alliances.”

 

In the midst of this change, the authors of the paper were curious about how donors are going about working out how to best invest their money – and what kinds of learning is involved.

 

They spoke with 18 experts from the three donor countries, most of whom were from the ministries and implementing agencies concerned with REDD+. Using a conceptual framework that included three levels of learning: cognitive/technical, social/political and structural/institutional, and four modes of learning: study, observation, experience and interaction, they also considered where learning sat on three scales: individual to institutional; generalist to specialist and incremental to transformative.

 

Lastly, they tried to assess the “depth” of learning: “That is, is it just about superficial, incremental shifts, or are we really changing the way we understand things, and jointly developing critical ideas?” Schroeder said.

 

The analysis showed that different kinds of learning were prevalent in the three countries. In Norway, which has the most funding of any donor country earmarked for REDD+, the strongest contributions were at the social/political and structural/institutional levels.

 

Germany brought a long history of working on forest issues in a number of countries; its contribution to the body of learning was largely operational and technical.

The UK also had “a very pragmatic, analytical approach to REDD+,” said Schroeder: “it really made a good contribution to those technical and socio-political levels of learning, with some quite big-picture-oriented answers and also engages innovatively with the private sector”.

 

The researchers also found that the three donor countries were well-connected with each other and learned a lot through their interactions. “These countries all knew what the others were doing, so they were comfortable not reinventing the wheel, but sharing change expertise through the partnership they formed,” she said.

 

Find out more...

 

 

Go back

Partners News

President Biden Invites 40 World Leaders to Leaders’ Summit on Climate – President Félix Antoine Tshisekedi Tshilombo of the DRC and President Ali Bongo Ondimba, Gabon to attend

Today, President Biden invited 40 world leaders to the Leaders’ Summit on Climate he will host on April 22 and 23.  The virtual Leaders’ Summit will be live streamed for public viewing.

COMIFAC gets new leadership!

As replacements for outgoing statutory executives, the Extraordinary Council of COMIFAC Ministers have tapped the following as the new statutory executives: Executive Secretary: Mr. Hervé Martial MAIDOU from the Central African Republic; Deputy Executive Secretary-Technical Coordinator: Mr. Chouaibou NCHOUTPOUEN from the Republic of Cameroon; Administrative and Financial Director: Mr. François DAYANG from the Republic of Chad.

Climate crisis and the Congo Basin: The planet’s future may ride on President Tshisekedi’s grip on the DRC – dailymaverick

The Congo Basin’s forests and peatlands are a major component of Earth’s life-support systems, and it is a key supplier of vital minerals needed to build a low carbon economy. The case for the people of the Congo to benefit from not exploiting these resources is irrefutable.

ATIBT Flash News 02/04/2021

Read: Position of European Partners on SIGIF 2 in Cameroon; Only few days left to register for the webinars "The Role of Forest Certification in the EUTR"; ATIBT technical data sheet : quality of plantation species for timber use; "Choosing tropical woods to fight climate change" says Timber Trade Federation...

Forest Watch The latest forest news April 2021: Discarding a decade of effort developing FLEGT licenses or ignoring key land rights in EC proposals to fight deforestation won't keep forests standing

Read: FLEGT ‘Fitness Check’: Abandoning FLEGT licenses would harm forest governance and the legal timber trade; EU Law on deforestation: Key land rights risk being ignored in DG Environment’s proposal; Could the palm oil arrangement between Indonesia and Switzerland offer lessons for EU and Indonesia free trade agreement negotiations?

Governments Discussing Declaration on Recovering Better in Decade of Action for SDGs - IISD

The co-facilitators for the negotiated outcome of the 2021 UN High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development have issued an outline for consideration. The proposed structure includes sections on: the impact of COVID-19 on the 2030 Agenda; progress towards the SDGs under review in 2021; and accelerated actions to achieve the SDGs.

The German CBFP Facilitation and COMIFAC are preparing for the 2021 Climate and Biodiversity Conferences of the Parties

From 9 to 13 March the COMIFAC Working Group meetings of the Central African Climate and Biodiversity Negotiators took place in Douala, Cameroon. These two meetings were held at the same time and place, with financial support provided by the German cooperation.

Designing Fiscal Instruments for Sustainable Forests - World Bank Group

This publication adds to ongoing work by the World Bank Group on how to better design and incorporate fiscal policy within the climate and sustainable development policy mix. The publication shows how various fiscal reforms can positively influence forest conservation while freeing up resources that can be used for national development.

Protect faster, Restore stronger.

Environmental issues affect us all. As is it, the planet is moving towards a global warming of 3°C by 2100. This is not the future we want. Forests, our first carbon sink within submerged land, are however in critical danger, with the possible savannahisation of the Amazon and tropical forests that could eventually turn into proper CO2 emitters. Faced with these projections, that involve unimaginable socio-economic consequences, our absolute priority can be summed up in a single word: reduction. Reducing our carbon footprint. Reducing deforestation. Reducing the degradation of forests. Reducing them increasingly and continuously.

How fiscal policy can help save forests - worldbank

The world is facing unprecedented economic and environmental challenges. While climate change increasingly poses risks to macroeconomic and fiscal stability, deforestation and forest degradation impair the ability of forests to act as carbon sinks and reduce the resiliency of local communities to climate damages. The loss and decay of forests also threaten global biodiversity, the provision of ecosystem services, and other core ecological functions that economies worldwide rely on.

How can NDCs contribute to forest governance & resilient local communities? - Fern

Fern’s report Beyond commitments: How can Nationally Determined Contributions contribute to forest governance and resilient local communities? looks at progress, challenges, and opportunities in six African countries: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, Liberia, and Republic of the Congo.  

Nature-based recovery – essential for people and planet - UICN

The undeniable connection between nature, human health, and economic well-being has become more evident than ever during this time of crisis. Resilience is in our nature: IUCN and its Members are working to ensure a nature-based recovery that can deliver sustainable solutions, providing a foundation for a healthier relationship between humanity and the planet.

Renewables in Cities 2021 Global Status Report –UNEP

REN21’s Renewables in Cities Global Status Report (REC) series provides an overview of the status, trends and developments of renewable energy in cities, using the most up-to-date information and data available. The REC’s neutral, fact-based approach documents in detail the annual developments in policies, markets, investments and citizen action, with a particular focus on renewables in public, residential and commercial buildings as well as public and private urban transport. This report aims to inform decision makers and to create an active exchange of views and information around urban renewable energy.

UK-Norway Collaborative Initiative Seeks to Boost Climate Finance – IISD

The UK and Norway launched an initiative on sustainable finance that will serve as a platform for British and Norwegian financial institutions to share knowledge and best practices focused on actionable climate solutions in the financial sector and explore the regulatory frameworks and investment decisions that would be necessary to achieve a zero-emissions economy.

SDG 6 Acceleration Efforts Underway as Data Shows Targets Off Track - IISD

UN-Water convened a three-day event to discuss accelerating progress towards water and sanitation for all by 2030, and a report that indicates ambitions for 2030 remain off-track. Participants were briefed on the SDG 6 Global Acceleration Framework, upcoming high-level events on water, and the preparatory process for the 2023 UN conference for the midterm review of the Water Action Decade.

Forest restoration: why offsetting could derail the path to recovery and well-being

This Sunday, 21 March, is the United Nations International Day of Forests (IDF), intended to celebrate and raise global awareness of the importance of forests. The theme is "Forest restoration: a path to recovery and well-being", a cause that Fern championed in our recent report looking at how rights-based forest restoration can empower communities, recover biodiversity, and tackle the climate crisis. It also explained that forest restoration must never be used to greenwash other sectors' lack of action towards climate objectives.

A ‘vaccine’ for tropical forests? - GCF

Elon Musk tweeted earlier this year that he would be "donating $100 million towards a prize for best carbon capture technology”. Out of 600 thousand likes and retweets, twenty thousand corresponded to a brilliant solution: “A tree”. The Tesla boss responded that trees were, indeed, part of the solution, but that we may require something that is “ultra-large-scale industrial in 10 to 20 years”. The sense of acting ‘urgently’ and at ‘scale’ are clearly central to the concepts of innovations announced in his offer.

Pastoralism and Conflict: Tools for Prevention and Response in the Sudano-Sahel

The findings and recommendations in this Toolkit were identified based on a meta-review of program evaluations and scholarly research in French and English, supplemented by a series of key informant interviews with program implementers. The Toolkit was validated through review by an Advisory Council of external civil society practitioners and researchers as well as practitioners from Search for Common Ground’s field offices across the Sudano-Sahel (Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Nigeria, Niger, South Sudan, Sudan).

Not Too Late to Undo Forest Damage, Secretary-General Says, in Message for International Day, while Warning ‘We Risk a Point of No Return - UN

Following is UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ message for the International Day of Forests, observed on 21 March: Humanity’s well-being is inextricably linked to the health of our planet.  Forests play a crucial role.